UCSF University of California, San Francisco      About UCSF       Search UCSF       UCSF Medical Center     
School of Medicine  
 
Print This Page For Normal View, Click Here For Larger Font Sizes', Click Here
 
 
Osher Center for Integrative Medicine
Patient Care
Classes and Lectures
Medical Education
Fellowships
Research
Resources
Giving Opportunities
News and Events
About Us
 
 

Randomized Controlled Trial of Breath Therapy for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain- pilot

Context: Patients suffering from chronic low back pain (cLBP) are often unsatisfied with medical care and seek alternative therapies. Many mind-body techniques claim to help patients with LBP by enhancing “body awareness” which includes proprioception deficient in cLBP but have not been rigorously studied in cLBP.

BT is a western mind-body therapy integrating body-awareness, breathing, meditation, and movement. Preliminary data suggest benefits from BT for proprioception and LBP.

Objective: To assess the effect of Breath Therapy on cLBP.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Subjects: 36 patients with cLBP.

Interventions: Breath Therapy (BT) versus Physical therapy (PT).

Main Outcome Measures: Pain by visual analog scale (VAS), function by Roland Scale, overall health by SF-36 at baseline, 6-8 weeks, and 6 months. Balance as a potential surrogate measure for proprioception and body-awareness.

Results: Pre to post intervention patients in both groups improved in pain (VAS: -2.7 with BT, -2.4 with PT; SF-36: +14.9 with BT and +21.0 with PT). BT recipients improved in function (Roland: –4.8) and in the physical and emotional role (SF-36: +15.5 and 14.3). PT recipients improved in vitality (SF-36: +15.0). Average improvements were not different between groups. At 6-8 weeks results showed a trend favoring BT, at 6-months favoring PT. Balance measures showed no improvements and no correlations with other outcomes.

Conclusions: Patients suffering from cLBP improved significantly with BT. Changes in standard LBP measures of pain and disability were comparable to those from high-quality, extended PT. BT was safe. Qualitative data suggested improved coping skills and new insight into the effect of stress on the body from BT. Balance measures did not seem to be valid measures of clinical change in LBP.

Return to Previous Page

1701 Divisadero Street
Suite 150
San Francisco, CA 94115
415-353-7700
Updated: May 3, 2007
    Site Map    Contact Info     ©UC Regents